I am often asked where a person should begin if they want to examine the resurrection honestly rather than take it on someone’s say-so. My answer is to begin where the skeptics themselves begin. There is a short list of facts about Jesus that the majority of scholars accept, and I mean scholars across the spectrum, writing in the mainstream literature, not preachers speaking to the choir. Start with what your opponent already grants.
The Four Facts
- Jesus of Nazareth was executed by Roman crucifixion.
- His tomb was found empty by His followers.
- Individuals and groups, friend and skeptic alike, had experiences they were convinced were encounters with the risen Jesus.
- His followers were transformed from hiding to fearless public proclamation, and the church exploded in the very city where He had been killed.
Those are the data points. You can quarrel over how to interpret them, but the interpretation has to cover all four. A theory that explains three and waves at the fourth is not a theory. It is a preference.
Testing the Alternatives
Run the usual alternatives through the list and watch what happens.
Hallucinations? They do not empty tombs. Whatever the followers saw or thought they saw, the body still has to be accounted for.
Theft? Someone took the body and the disciples lied about it. But theft does not convert enemies, and the third fact includes skeptics who became convinced against their own interests.
The wrong tomb? The followers went to the wrong grave and the whole movement grew out of a mistake. That theory collapses the moment the authorities walk to the right tomb and produce the body. They had every reason to do it. They never did.
Each alternative explains one fact and stumbles over the others. Only one explanation covers all four at once, and it is the one the witnesses went to their deaths still affirming: He is risen.
Weigh It Like a Juror
I am not asking you to feel anything. I am asking you to do what a juror does: take the facts both sides agree on, lay the explanations beside them, and ask which one accounts for the evidence without special pleading. Spectators react. Jurors weigh. Four facts are on the table, and when the weighing is done, one explanation is left.
Get new articles by email
Subscribe and I will send you a short note whenever a new article is published on this site. No spam, and you can unsubscribe at any time.