The most famous pelvis in the history of evolution was cut apart with a power saw and reassembled into the shape you see in museums today. I know how that sounds. It is not a rumor, and it is not a creationist exaggeration. It was filmed for television.
You already know her name. Lucy. She is Australopithecus afarensis, found in Ethiopia in 1974, and she is evolution’s Exhibit A, the poster child of the ape-to-man parade. Every museum model of her walks upright on two legs with human eyes, human posture, and sometimes human feet. She has a chimp-sized brain, a gorilla-shaped jaw, climbing arms, and wrist bones like a knuckle-walker, and she is in your child’s textbook as your grandmother. The entire case for that upright walk runs through a single bone.
The Pelvis and the Power Saw
In the PBS Nova documentary In Search of Human Origins, which aired on June 3, 1997, anatomist Owen Lovejoy explained on camera that Lucy’s pelvis, as found, did not fit the bipedal picture. His conclusion was that the fossil must have been broken and distorted during burial, because as preserved, the anatomy looked wrong.
So he took a cast of the pelvis and, with the cameras rolling, cut it apart with a power saw, reshaped the pieces, and reassembled them into the configuration he was confident it had originally held. The product of that rebuild is the human-like, bipedal pelvis that now stands in museums, textbooks, and documentaries around the world.
Let me be precisely fair here, because I never want to overstate. Fossils really do get crushed and distorted in the ground, and reconstructing them is a legitimate scientific practice. Lovejoy hid nothing. He demonstrated his procedure publicly, and he sincerely believes his rebuild recovered the original shape.
But here is the question the museum placard never asks: what guided the saw?
As discovered, the fossil did not show a human-style walking pelvis. It was judged distorted because it did not look bipedal, and then it was rebuilt until it did. The conclusion steered the reconstruction, and now the reconstruction is offered as proof of the conclusion. A courtroom has a name for that: circular evidence.
Calling the Other Witnesses
The pelvis is not the only witness. Call the rest of the skeleton to the stand and ask what the bones say before the saw and the story get to them.
Exhibit 1: The Skeleton
Lucy consists of 47 bones, roughly 40 percent of a skeleton, with a braincase about the size of a chimpanzee’s. Time magazine put it plainly back in the 1970s: tiny skull, head like an ape.
Exhibit 2: The Jaw
In 2007, Israeli anatomist Yoel Rak and his colleagues published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that the afarensis jawbone closely matches a gorilla’s. Their own conclusion was that this casts doubt on afarensis as a human ancestor. That is not a creationist journal. It is theirs.
Exhibit 3: The Wrists
In 2000, evolutionists Brian Richmond and David Strait reported in Nature that afarensis wrist bones carry the distinctive locking features of knuckle-walking apes, the very anatomy chimps and gorillas use to walk on their knuckles. The same paper cataloged neck, shoulder, arm, finger, and toe features suited for life in the trees. Evolutionists file all of this under retentions from an ancestor. Look at the bones without the story and they are simply the bones of an ape.
Exhibit 4: The Rival Rebuilds
Other qualified experts have rebuilt the same pelvis and come away with a different animal. Anatomist Christine Berge, writing in the Journal of Human Evolution, reconstructed the australopithecine pelvis and concluded that its walk clearly differed from a human’s, with an unstable lower limb and anatomy still suited for the trees. Years earlier, Stern and Susman’s landmark study in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology found the pelvis and other bones well adapted for climbing, with the hip blades oriented like a chimpanzee’s rather than like yours. Same fragments, different experts, opposite Lucys. The fossil is not speaking for itself. The worldview holding the saw is doing the talking.
Exhibit 5: The Famous Knee
What about the bipedal knee angle that started it all in 1973? That knee was found a mile and a half from Lucy and 230 feet deeper in the rock. And the same knock-kneed angle appears in living orangutans and spider monkeys, which nobody calls your ancestors.
Where the Walking Lucy Came From
So where did the powerful image of a walking Lucy come from? Mostly from a set of footprints at Laetoli, Tanzania, a thousand miles from where Lucy was found. Paleoanthropologist Tim White described them as like modern human footprints, with a well-shaped heel, an arch, and a straight big toe.
Here is the twist. On our view, the prints look human because humans made them. The only thing forbidding that conclusion is the assumed evolutionary date, which insists humans did not exist yet. The Laetoli footprints are not evidence that Lucy walked upright. They are human footprints assigned to an ape by a timeline.
What Remains When the Story Is Stripped Away
Let me be fair one more time. Lucy is a genuine fossil, a real extinct ape, and honest researchers have given her careful study. The bones themselves are facts. But strip away the rebuild, the artist’s human eyes, and the confident museum lighting, and what is left? An extinct ape: a chimp-sized brain, a gorilla-shaped jaw, knuckle-walker wrists, climbing anatomy, and a pelvis that turns human-like only after human hands re-engineer it. The family tree drawn around her is a story, and it was the artists, not the bones, who supplied the human eyes, the human hands, and the human hope.
Your ancestry was not buried in Ethiopia. It was declared at creation, in words that need no reconstruction.
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. (Genesis 1:27)
You are not a polished ape, and you never were. Deep down, in the part of you that no fossil can explain, the part that is reading and reasoning and weighing evidence right now, you already know it. No saw required.
Get new articles by email
Subscribe and I will send you a short note whenever a new article is published on this site. No spam, and you can unsubscribe at any time.